Search for: "Smith v. People" Results 761 - 780 of 3,898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___ (2020) (directive limiting in-person worship services to 50 people); South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority in Smith, the First Amendment has never been a license to be a law unto oneself. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am by Russell Knight
When people get married, they join their lives…at least on an ongoing basis. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The ICO has set out how seven of the UK’s political parties need to improve the way they handle people’s personal data after assessing how they manage data protection. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 10:32 am by Kalvis Golde
The Supreme Court is considering whether to overrule Smith this term in Fulton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The new Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, whom most people assume is not a friend to the Smith decision, pointedly asked CSS's counsel: [Y]ou argue in your brief that Smith should be overruled. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Smith, the free exercise case that is at stake in Fulton. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
“You didn’t indicate in your notes, Officer Smith, that my client had any problems producing license or registration. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
Most people, understandably, see the Supreme Court of the United States as the court of last resort. [read post]
First, although the court might purport to restore the pre-Smith compelling interest test, as Congress did when it reinstated the 1963 rule of Sherbert v. [read post]