Search for: "Soling v. New York State" Results 761 - 780 of 3,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
Disciplinary arbitrator has jurisdiction to hear a defense based on CSL §75-b, the Whistle Blower statuteMatter of Kowaleski v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 61 AD3d 1081NYS Correction Officer Barbara Kowaleski was served with a notice of discipline charging her with violating various provisions of the employees' manual as the result of her conduct on three separate occasions.The charges alleged Kowaleski:[1] had made inappropriate comments… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
Disciplinary arbitrator has jurisdiction to hear a defense based on CSL §75-b, the Whistle Blower statuteMatter of Kowaleski v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2009 NY Slip Op 02515, decided on April 2, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentNYS Correction Officer Barabara Kowaleski was served with a notice of discipline charging her with violating various provisions of the employees' manual as the result of her conduct on three… [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:52 am
Scheich made to an ABC News reporter about the Charney v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
The red sole is valid and infringed, says the Court of The HagueChristian Louboutin v Van Haren Schoenen BV C/09/450182 / HA ZA 13-999, Court of The Hague (February 2019)For the first time Retromark strays beyond its UK/EU-level remit, in order to see the legendary red sole saga through to its conclusion in the Dutch courts. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  That’s the basic lesson of 97 2nd LLC v Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP      2019 NY Slip Op 30021(U)  January 4, 2019  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154593/2018  Judge: Arlene P. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
Plaintiff argued that it did answer the verification request, and that Allstate was required to deny or pay on the claim after its receipt, but that it was not entitled to do nothing.In accepting plaintiff's argument and finding for plaintiff, New York Civil Court Judge Peter Moulton held:The sole issue to be decided by the court is whether defendant was compelled to deny or pay the claim, or whether defendant could deem plaintiff's letter responses insufficient.… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:18 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
    The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently faced that question and determined whether appropriators of images belonging to others are entitled to use the defense of fair use against a claim of copyright infringement. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently faced that question and determined whether appropriators of images belonging to others are entitled to use the defense of fair use against a claim of copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
After hearing, the motion is ALLOWED in part. 1 Plaintiff asserts violations of the false claims acts in California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, District of Columbia, and New York. [read post]