Search for: "Sony Corporation" Results 761 - 780 of 909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2009, 6:13 am
Four record companies, including Sony BMG and Warner Brothers [corporate websites], brought suit against Tenenbaum in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts [official website], accusing him of illegally downloading 30 [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISAntonio FrankoWednesday's first witness was Antonio Franko, a high school friend of Joels. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
(in support of petitioners) Brief amici curiae of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 10:59 pm by Vicki Heng
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers' (“ICANN”) continuing efforts to infinitely expand the number of Generic Top Level Domains (“gTLDs”) beyond the current 21 which include .com, .net. and .org, have received mixed reviews. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:29 am
Seemingly agreeing with Helprin and seeking reforms to put “guardrails” on the Web is Sony CEO Michael Lynton. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:57 pm
They are especially interested in junior corporate lawyers, with one to four years of experience, to help build the transactional side of the firm. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:50 am
They're hookers working for the RIAA.And they'll (try to) justify the evil they do to people such as Michigan student Brittany Kruger by saying they're lawyers so it's OK: that it's their duty to do whatever they can to help their clients, the unprincipled representatives of a corporate street gang called the Big 4.Why do I mention Brittany in particular out of the 40,000 innocent people, including very young children, across America who are being harried and… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:49 pm
  Mike explains how secondary liability theories of contributory liability and vicarious liability can be employed by copyright owners to hold dual use technology vendors accountable for copyright infringement of technology users, and he also explains how the US Supreme Court's decision in Sony Corporation of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Defining WIPO’s role (Intellectual Property Watch) Introduction to patent monetisation resources for corporations and entrepreneurs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Top PCT filing firms revealed (IAM) Commercialising innovation mini-series – interview with industrial designer Jim Richardson (IP Watchdog) Royalty triggers are fraught with litigation risk, so handle with care (Technology Transfer Tactics) The IP zone: a new concept for introducing needed information and… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Appalling corporate arrogance. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
One of the apparent - though largely unproven - benefits of media integration is the ability of conglomerates like the Walt Disney Company, Time Warner, the News Corporation, Viacom, Sony and General Electric to sell subsidiary rights to the many divisions within the company. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
In its first opportunity to demonstrate its position on the constitutionality of the Copyright Act's statutory damages provisions as applied to mp3 files having a market value of 99 cents or less, the Obama Justice Department -- staffed by RIAA lawyers in its 2nd and 3rd highest positions -- has filed a motion for intervention and brief in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
RIAA continues filing lawsuits (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Decisions US Department of Justice: Texas man sentenced to 41 months prison for selling counterfeit software worth $1 million on websites (ContentAgenda) Eminem producers lose bid for massive iTunes royalties (Ars Technica) (Law360) Supreme Court to hear case brought by freelance writers against several major publishers and online media services on the electronic reproduction of freelance works: In re: Literary Works… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Plaintiffs have requested permission to file surreply papers, further objecting to the deposition of Matthew Oppenheim, in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]