Search for: "State v. Agent"
Results 761 - 780
of 11,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
So goes the rationale for customs agents demanding passwords of people when seeking to enter the United States of America. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
He brought a putative class action in the New York state court asserting several state and common law violations against the defendants after they terminated his and other agents’ sales-agent relationship. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
Rossetti Marketing Ltd v Diamond Sofa Co Ltd [2011] EWHC 2482 (QB); [2011] WLR (D) 287 “Whether a party was a commercial agent within the meaning of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the member states relating to self-employed commercial agents or the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 was to be determined by reference to the terms and context of the agreement at the date it was… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:09 am
Harrison signed a lease on Relinquishment Act land, as agent for the State. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
App. 2005); State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:14 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:25 am
US v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
In today’s case of the day, Myrtle v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:16 am
Mayo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This Article reexamines and reconceptualizes Justice Louis Brandeis’s dictum in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:03 am
In Rodney v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Fiore, decided yesterday, the Court unanimously concluded that a pair of professional gamblers from Nevada could not force a Georgia law enforcement agent to litigate against them in Nevada, because the agent had never had connections to that state. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:42 am
The Supreme Court stated in dismissing the claim that s 94(5) of the Act reads as referring to countries where its citizens are free from any serious risk of systematic persecution either by the state or by non-state agents. [read post]
