Search for: "State v. Armes"
Results 761 - 780
of 11,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 9:40 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a federal sentencing court must determine whether "an offense under State law" is a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) [18 USC § 924] by consulting the "maximum term of imprisonment" applicable to a defendant's prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant's conviction for that offense.... [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
On appeal, the Government conceded that Cesare improperly received concurrent sentences in violation of double jeopardy because bank robbery is a lesser included offense of armed bank robbery, but argued that the two separate $100 special assessments be left intact because special assessments are not punishment.The Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:38 pm
Alan Mygatt-Tauber has published Medellín v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
“Of course, properly understood, it is no limitation upon arms control by the states. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:39 pm
V. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:04 pm
In that time, Padilla had honorably served the United States as a member of the Armed Forces during the Vietnam War. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
United States Senate Armed Forces Services Committee, et al., No. 11-1098 (previously discussed here). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:16 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
In Welch v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:48 am
Marbury v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 12:26 pm
Thereafter, the statute requires the President to impose a number of sanctions relating to (i) foreign assistance, (ii) arms sales, (iii) arms sales financing, (iv) denial of U.S. credit assistance (e.g., Export-Import Bank loans) and (v) a prohibition on exports of any controlled goods. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm
State, 25 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), and Mackey v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:28 pm
As we said in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:47 am
But “well regulated” meant that the militias were trained, armed and controlled by the state. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:08 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court has just held, in Britt v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:20 am
Belhaj & Anor v Straw & Ors Background Mr Belhaj, the first respondent, was a commander of the opposition during the Libyan armed conflict in 2011. [read post]
