Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 761 - 780
of 9,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2013, 5:16 am
The case, Wolfinger v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:05 am
The 79-page complaint (full text) in Franciscan Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:20 pm
For instance, in S.H. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 6:28 am
See Parrish v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The opinion is Sorrell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:29 am
The denial of review in Walker-McGill v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
The former Illinois State Police trooper claimed that Dr. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
The former Illinois State Police trooper claimed that Dr. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
While plaintiff said the doctor coerced him to enter the facility, state law allows doctors to "encourage" people to do so. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:56 am
The Illinois Medical Malpractice Act of 2005, which capped non-economic damages such as pain and suffering to $500,000 doctors and $1 million for hospitals, came before the court in the case of Abigaile Lebron v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:14 pm
In the case of Leuker v Auto Owners, an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeals made a very pro-plaintiff decision: The Court unequivocally stated that "an insurance medical examination cannot serve to retroactively render reasonable those delays that took place more than 30 days before the report was received. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:52 pm
The case is Sutton v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:00 am
Additional Resources: Jefferson Packing House LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
Loss of Chance Doctors will defend these cases by claiming arguing that the loss of a chance of recovery is not a recoverable head of damages in Canada (see for example the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Laferriere v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm
However, the appellate court found that Arroyo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am
In relation to the Secretary of State’s Article 101 TFEU damages claim, Servier reminded the court that even if it was found liable, the GC had held that the relevant market was wide enough to include other ACE inhibitors, and the Secretary of State should have encouraged its doctors to prescribe cheaper, generic ACE inhibitors alternatives to Perindopril when treating patients. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
State. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:21 am
FDA," March 8, 2023; "AHM v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
