Search for: "State v. Franc"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court chose to refer this question to the CJEU, which replied in a decision of the 26 February 2015 (C-41/14 – Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaries, see previous post here). [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
The world of opinions changed, however, in 2011, when a working group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) met in Lyon, France, and issued its support for the general causation claim in a suspect document published in 2012.[5] The IARC has strict rules that prohibit anyone who has any connection with manufacturing industry from serving on its working groups, but the Agency allows consultants and contractors for the lawsuit industry to serve without limitation. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
The French National Assembly voted to extend France’s State of Emergency for three months. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:19 am
” The late legal historian David Currie noted in his volumes on the Constitution in Congress that “[v]irtually no one questioned [Monroe’s proclamation] at the time. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
Art 8 of GDPR states that if a child is under age of 16 then it requires parental consent but that this default age for lawful consent may be lowered by individual member states down to minimum of 13. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
Simons Waterfront LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Donald France v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:03 pm
The French NCP has taken primary responsibility on Colombia-based issues because MNE headquartered in France; consulting with U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 9:50 pm
Since the landmark 1980 case of Filártiga v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 3:09 pm
Supreme Court in its 1999 Davis v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
Smith Religions and law: current challenges in Latin America, Juan Navarro Floria State and religion in Europe, Giuseppe Casuscelli States and religions in post-Communist Europe, Giovanni Barberini The recent developments of church-state relations in Central Europe, Balázs Schanda Church and state relations in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia, Antonello De Oto States and churches in Northern Europe: achieving freedom and equality through… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am
A. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:15 am
Mailbank.com, Inc., D2000-1277 (WIPO March 1, 2001) ( and Int’l Raelian Religion & Raelian Religion of France v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
Consequently the term Simply would be directly understood by the average consumer in France. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
A new CJEU referenceIn 2012, France adopted a law allowing the digital exploitation of out-of-print 20th century books. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
Besides yesterday's Opinion of AG Wathelet, another recent example that comes to mind is the Opinion of AG Szpunar in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, C-174/15 [the 'e-lending case', currently in progress and noted here], in which he clearly stated [para 34] that "the principal objective of copyright is to safeguard the interests of authors".Secondly, should the CJEU follow the Opinion of AG… [read post]
