Search for: "State v. Jews" Results 761 - 780 of 955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Her defamation claims based on a report that she used the n-word also failed, as did her negligence and other state law claims. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:33 am by Eugene Volokh
I also think the Supreme Court was right in Cohen v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Ecclesiastical Law Journal The latest issue of the EccLJ is now available, including: Daniel J Hill, ‘Could the State do Without Marriage Law? [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am by Todd Buchwald
(See paragraph 135 et seq of the ICJ’s 2015 Judgment in Croatia v Serbia.) [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am by Josh Blackman
I had some concerns that the Court would adopt a Masterpiece-style analysis in light of Governor Cuomo's comments about orthodox Jews. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
In a states' rights oriented decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
will enjoy them more than being asked if the regulation of mudflaps by state X can be said to violate the Commerce Clause.. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:01 pm by Ken
In Aggravation: V. snarky assholes. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
In White v Sweden ((2008) 46 EHRR 3) the Article 8 “right to protection of reputation” was combined with the positive obligations of the state in the application. [read post]