Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2014, 8:48 am
As readers of this blog know, we have been following the case of Marcia Fuller French, et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm
Last I looked, the Sixth Circuit, for example, was saying that all its sister circuits had rejected it, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger analyzes this week’s oral argument in the habeas appeal case Jennings v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:55 am
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
” CJLF’s national legal director, Kent Scheidegger, has tirelessly filed amicus briefs in many major capital cases, advocating speedier affirmance, and quicker (or no) federal review, of state death penalty judgments. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
” Also at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks ahead at Elonis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
David Allen Green has helpfully gathered together a round up of useful links about the proposal on his Jack of Kent blog. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that death row inmate Warren Lee Hill has filed a petition seeking review of the Georgia Supreme Court’s ruling against him in his “challenge to the state law providing confidentiality to the suppliers of the drugs used for lethal injection. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
According to the 5th Circuit in Belle v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm
At no point has the United States ever executed more than a tiny fraction of one percent of its murderers. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am
There is nothing in Article 8 which requires the state to pay for the full amount of rent due to a landlord. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an update on Ryan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:18 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States, as recently as this past term in Bond v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:22 am
The Court said that the “purpose” of § 1133 was “that the claimant be notified of the reasons for the denial of the claim and have a fair opportunity for review,” and interpreted this to apply to judicial review (quoting Kent v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:01 am
., et al v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:38 pm
30; M.B. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
