Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 2:33 pm
Levi, No. 14-1507. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
The price tag for the 2010 election cycle in Washington State just went up and it will likely be influenced by out-of-state donors as the share of in-state donors reaches contribution limits. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Finally, he requests that he be resentenced pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:57 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:31 pm
In Freeman Investments, LP v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:25 am
Hagman, trustee, v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 1:44 pm
” The Board will also, at some point, rule on whether it intends to proceed with a hearing on whether there can be a levy on microSDs for the period of January 1 to November 6, 2012. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
Tennessee State University, No. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
Kramer profiles Konstantin V. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
Bailey explores the depth and limits of one of the carveouts given sanction from sexual harassment liability by the Supreme Court in its 1998 decision, Oncale v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
Further indirect criticism was levied at the UK’s increasing use of electronic surveillance and the overly frequent authorisation (including self-authorisation) of “interception warrants”. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 11:10 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:34 am
Because the right to subject corporate stock to levy and sale under execution is purely statutory, a levy which does not comply with the requirements of a state statute is invalid. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm
Lawsuit by pilot against landowner who shot down his drone is dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction [Cyrus Farivar, ArsTechnica; earlier here and (criminal case) here] Super-broad readings of Emoluments Clause intended to trip up President Trump might have unwelcome consequences for over 2 million military retirees and 2.8 million federal employees also affected by the Clause’s interpretation [Chuck Blanchard via Andy Grewal; earlier on Emoluments Clause] “Appeals court throws… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
At least one state court–before Uveges v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
Levy On June 13, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:45 am
The taxman prevailed in ETC Marketing v. [read post]
