Search for: "State v. Liptak" Results 761 - 780 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am by Kiran Bhat
In the New York Times, Adam Liptak also discusses Sorrell but focuses on Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by James Bickford
United States; both are scheduled for argument in February. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am by Adam Chandler
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:16 am by Amanda Rice
The ACLU seeks to challenge the en banc court’s application of the state secrets privilege. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm by Raj Chohan
Times; Jess Bravin and Ann Zimmerman have this piece in the Wall Street Journal; Adam Liptak and Steven Greenhouse file this report in the New York Times. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
Russell, as Adam Liptak explains in the New York Times. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am by Adam Chandler
Discussion and analysis of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:34 pm by cdw
From the intro, as previously foreshadowed (pdf/html): This edition looks at two recent cases addressing indigent defense, one capital, State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
United States, while the Des Moines Register reports on Pepper v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:19 pm by Jordan G.
"To support his premise Liptak states that the Court hears less cases than it has in past terms but the median word count of its opinions has increased dramatically. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:28 am by David Oscar Markus
"And in a recent case dealing with a California law regulating the sale or rental of violent video games to children, Justice Anthony Kennedy pressed a skeptical state lawyer on whether the v-chip blocking device, rather than a state law, could be used to keep children away from the games. [read post]