Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am
The Court therefore gave consideration to what Lord Kitchin denoted the “Actavis questions” further to the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am
The appeal was heard and shall be considered by a five justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Wilson. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Lord Neuberger stated therefore that the issue of whether the 1999 Act costs regime infringed the Convention “is open to this Court to reconsider”, but that “it would be wrong for this Court to decide the point without the Government having had the opportunity to address the Court on the issue”. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Mrs Braganza appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
But, as Lord Neuberger acknowledged, it has also been said that the rigour demanded of an art 3-compliant investigation is “similar” to but by definition then, not the same as investigations into state complicity. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
Rainy Sky S.A. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm
Rainy Sky S.A. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:55 pm
The Lord Nataraja Temple in the town of Chidambaram is an important religious pilgrimage site. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The test of dishonesty is as set out by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan and by Lord Hoffmann in Barlow Clowes… When dishonesty is in question the fact-finding tribunal must first ascertain (subjectively) the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the facts. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:57 am
Interestingly, while not a party, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government was given permission to intervene. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
