Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
Last week, federal district courts in three states handed down decisions in cases in which a former employee was suing his or her employer for refusing to provide them with a religious exemption from the employer's Covid vaccine mandate.In Crocker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Neuberger gave a short concurring judgment. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
” Following the ceremony, Mr Sumption will be styled Lord Sumption, and will begin sitting on Thursday 12 January, among a panel of five Justices hearing the shipping dispute case of Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. v E.N.E. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Cases of the Day, NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Lastly, Lord Justice Clark dismissed Popplewell J’s third reason above by stating “I do not regard the validity of my interpretation to be impugned because there is an element of tautology” and “I do not regard his erratic use of the comma as any real guide to meaning. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am
Quick links House of Lords: Lords private members’ bills ballot 2024, Paul Magrath, ICLR: Changes to Neutral Citations for Family Court and Court of Protection. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am
In delivering the lead judgment, Lord Neuberger stated that, when interpreting a written contract, the court must identify the intention of the parties by reference to “what a reasonable person having all the background knowledge… would have understood them to be using the language in the contract to mean”. [read post]
COVID-19 Daily Insurance Regulatory Updates To Keep You Informed During The Lockdown (July 24, 2020)
24 Jul 2020, 3:13 pm
Ward, who yesterday ordered coordination of Tambellini v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The court also considered the specific strand of authority concerning legally privileged documents disclosed by mistake, sometimes called the Ashburton v Pape jurisdiction (after Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469). [read post]
