Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 761 - 780 of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The General Court affirmed that the ORO marks could not be said to be scarcely distinctive, and Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM-Barilla Alimentare (SELEZIONE ORO BARILLA could not be said to have established a precedent. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
City of Eagle River v Slusarczyk, 2015 WL 4079137 (WI App. 7/7/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Preemption, Signs Tagged: traffic signs [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Without the question mark, that's Alaska's state motto.With the question mark, it's our title for a post analyzing the on-going trial in State of Alaska v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:45 am by The Docket Navigator
In prosecuting this claim for relief, TriPharma is acting on behalf of the United States of America and is entitled to receive 50% of the damages.Tripharma LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gibson allegedly owns the mark FLYING V and the “Flying V Body Shape Design” and “Flying V Peg-Head Design. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
You can watch a video of Mark Ruffalo delivering an excerpt of Debs’ speech of June 16, 1918 here: Debs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
In a sense, the indirect consequences of Mass v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]