Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 7:44 am
In the recent case of Cox, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Defense in a recent trip-and-fall premises liability lawsuit argued a defect in a doorway that reportedly caused a patron to trip was not unreasonably dangerous, and further pointed to a so-called "categorical exemption" regarding entryway thresholds under state law. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am
Similarly, courts conditionally certifying classes often indicate that they cannot weigh the merits, but as reflected in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 6:27 pm
Wal-Mart Canada Corp. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:08 pm
Apr. 24, 2014) State of Indiana v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Syl. pt. 7, State v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am
While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
In the intervening years, class action jurisprudence seemed to take a step away from this thinking, spurred by the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:23 pm
They were sold at retailers across the United States and Canada, including stores such as Sam’s Club, Lowe’s, Sears, and Wal-Mart, from January 2005 through August 2013. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:39 am
Stockwell v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs argued that Wal-Mart v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
Citing extensively to Amgen, and also to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
Under the more expansive definition of disability, whether or not the employee could prove that his weight rose to the level of a disability under the ADA was not an issue at the pleading stage (Whittaker v America’s Car-Mart, Inc, April 24, 2014, Limbaugh, S). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
In Figy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:25 am
The appellate panel stated that the central argument in this case rested on a case that was not cited by either party, Donahue v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Odle, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Netzsch-Feinmahltechnik GmbH, Serial No. 79100238 (March 25, 2014) [not precedential].We know from Wal-Mart v. [read post]
