Search for: "State v. Monroe"
Results 761 - 780
of 898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 4:11 am
"Martinez v Monroe County Community College, 2008 NY Slip Op 0090, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Decided on February 1, 2008, is another decision that addresses same-sex marriage.The New York State Department of Civil Service recognizes same-sex marriage that is legal in the jurisdiction where it was performed for the purposes of eligibility for spousal benefits for NYSHIP health insurance State employees and the employees of participating… [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
County of Monroe, 850 N.Y.S.2d 740 (N.Y. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:33 pm
” Vartech Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Godfrey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven Cook v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
Moreover, while the Court of Appeals - the State's highest court - held in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:55 am
Monroe Community College, in which a New York state appellate court held that plaintiff Patricia Martinez’s valid, out-of-state marriage to her same-sex partner was entitled to recognition in New York State as a matter of comity. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:57 pm
The letter is in response to Martinez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Monroe Community College, in which the court relied on traditional principles of comity to conclude that New York State would recognize the Canadian same-sex marriage of a lesbian couple for purposes of enrollment in the defendant's employee benefits program. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:14 pm
"In a 2005 case, City of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 7:59 pm
County of Monroe, and Beth R. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Prickett v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Olson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 5:51 pm
County of Monroe, a state-wide precedent holding that a Canadian same-sex marriage was legally valid in New York. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Stefan Scott v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
C.M. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:28 pm
Nixon Peabody v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:22 pm
The respondent argued that a right to an equitable buyout was recognized in Lyons v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
Pavone v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. [read post]
