Search for: "State v. Neal"
Results 761 - 780
of 792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
Neal v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 1:19 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeNew Judge Must Re-Sentence Drug Defendants; Court Repeatedly Failed to Explain Guidelines DepartureUnited States, appellee-cross-appellant v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
" Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:17 am
Changus Assistant General Counsel Florida Department of Corrections 2601 Blair StoneRoad ' Tallahassee, FL32399Fax 850-922-4355 RE: STATE OF FLORIDA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
State, 716 N.E.2d 919, 933 (Ind. 1999); Angleton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:47 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:39 am
In Cohen [v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:47 pm
Mahler offers this article on the conflict between the Supreme Court's ruling in Rita v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:03 am
IPKat flagged a question this week from Neal Macrossan, the inventor behind the high-profile Aerotel v Telco Holdings case on software patenting (in essence, should Macrossan appeal to the House of Lords?). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Essentially Craig v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
See Toibb [v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:32 am
" State v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:58 am
State v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 12:04 am
Florida Death Penalty and Politics Florida Death Penalty Inquiry Welcomed Florida death row UCI and Florida State Prison v execution chamber Florida death work Florida death-penalty system: In legal limbo? [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:51 am
Teachers' Retirement Sys. of La. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:59 am
Because of a 7th Circuit decision in Hosty v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
Authority presented by the mortgagor even suggested that HUD did not contemplate its regulations to support affirmative state law claims by aggrieved mortgagors.On the other hand, the Court held, "ample authority" suggests that alleged violations of the regulations may be asserted defensively to halt a foreclosure action. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:40 am
See: Blaylock Grading Company, LLP v. [read post]