Search for: "State v. Peters"
Results 761 - 780
of 5,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 1:17 pm
I’ve got a new post up at Cato at Liberty explaining why the American Electric Power v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:06 am
No, I don't mean Judge Peter B. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:46 pm
In Deskins v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:43 am
Citing Blue Chip Stamps v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
By Peter M. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
Social media has been used this way before during other ‘crisis events,’ For example, in the aftermath of the 2011 riots, in R v Blackshaw [2011] EWCA Crim 2312 evidence was presented that suggested that social media was used to coordinate the public disorder that spread across the UK. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:54 am
Additional Resources: Strout v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 9:48 am
It then looks at the recent Supreme Court decision in Gall v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
In CELGENE CORPORATION v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
First up is Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:02 pm
United States Steel Corp., 871 F.3d 1174 (11th Cir. 2017). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
Heller represented MCM v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
Peter Shipley is a Bay Area hacker and patent-holder who sues technology companies under the corporate name Enhanced Security Research, LLC. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:18 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kapoor v National Westminster Bank Plc & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1083 (05 October 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley [2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) (30 September 2011) Triplot & Anor v Whetter [2011] EWHC 931 (QB) (30 September 2011) Cartlidge Morland (a firm) v Thomas [2011] EWHC 2086 (QB) (30 September 2011) Butler- Creagh v AIDA Hersham… [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:17 am
[1] Haseeb v Imperial Oil The post Human Rights Tribunal Again Sets New Law appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:17 am
[1] Haseeb v Imperial Oil The post Human Rights Tribunal Again Sets New Law appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his defense.3. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 8:54 am
Garcia Tatupu v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 6:02 am
In Howe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
