Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am
State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission, the Supreme Court upheld a California statute that imposed a moratorium on new nuclear power plants in the state until the United States developed a means of disposing of spent nuclear fuel. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:11 am
The United States Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:04 am
United States v. 323 "Quintales" of Green Coffee Beans, 2012 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:51 am
Valdes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:54 am
Jones v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm
Edge won in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Clarke LJ gave three key reasons in support of his conclusion: The structure of the Policy expressly stated that the insured perils were subject always to the exclusions. [read post]
EPA Releases Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessments on Neonicotinoid Assessments for Public Co
18 Dec 2017, 2:40 pm
By James V. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:53 pm
(North Carolina v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:49 am
By Jason Rantanen General Protecht Group v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:57 pm
Schloesser v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 7:35 pm
In the case of Robinson v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
The New York State 2022-2023 Budget[1] amendment QQ updated the State’s approach to freshwater wetlands regulation. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 7:37 pm
Board of Trustees of Vermilion Township v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:32 am
First up is State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
The resulting case is Andritz Sundwig GmbH v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 1:46 pm
Recently, in the case of Rhame v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 1:46 pm
Recently, in the case of Rhame v. [read post]
