Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 761 - 780
of 4,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
In Sotelo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
Trapp v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 6:49 am
Here are the materials in Town of Southampton v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:29 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 7:29 am
Facts: This case (Risinger v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
I recently came across a 2001 Hillsborough County, Florida DUI case (State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
As a result, environmental permitting (NPDES, Title V, New Source Review) has become far more complex. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:10 pm
Wade), 539 (Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
In 2020, in Bolger v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm
Abbott Point of Care v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
This time it's the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ordering summary judgment for the United States on March 10, 2009 in an interpleader action styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v Carrie R. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:30 am
Phillips v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Div. 2007) State v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
But because a “trial court is not bound by the nomenclature used by a party […], the trial court could treat [a motion to suppress] as a motion in limine” State v. [read post]