Search for: "State v. Sharpe"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Internet Cases Blog has published there articles covering significant recent cases in the United States: A summary judgment was recently awarded in favour of Chanel following the luxury brands challenge to the registrant of the domain name <chanelgraffitti.com>. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm
The number of people answering "not in favor" to Gallup's poorly worded basic question is the highest it has been since before Furman v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:02 am
[Washington Post] * "Sotomayor's sharp tongue will make her a match for Scalia. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
He stated that he purchased his ticket for $500 on the COPA Airlines website using a credit card, but that he did not have the credit card with him. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:13 am
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm
Movement to decriminalize and regulate marijuana—also brings fed/state interaction into sharp relief. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
On Friday 22 April 2016, the Court of Appeal (Sharp and Hamblen LJJ) heard an application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:03 am
Additional Resources: Texas v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:48 am
On Wednesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will rehear Brackeen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
In Shah v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Daimler--as well as recently-filed Sharp v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 US 496,… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:22 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:20 am
Sharp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
George v. [read post]
