Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 761 - 780
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 5:08 am
Superior Court applies retroactively. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
Federal courts are in certain respects superior to state courts. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
You help close some cases.But it's a pretty heavy inroad into a pervasive surveillance state, eh? [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:07 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:27 am
Malzberg v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
Superior Court — is even older than Brinker. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
The Hamilton Superior Court entered summary judgment for Patricia, Nicholas and Matthew Jakupko on their complaint against State Farm seeking underinsured coverage for their claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102(1987)). [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:33 am
In Property Reserve Inc. et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Superior Court, 151 Cal.App.3d 491, 198 Cal.Rptr. 829 (1984) and Cedars-Sinai Med. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:00 am
Co. v Superior Court (1997) 16 C4th 1101, 1107, 68 CR 2d 883, quoting Greyhound Corp. v Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355, 377, 15 CR 90. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
As we have previously written, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:44 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148 (2005), on that basis. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:18 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Fred Messer v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 7:20 am
The Superior Court found that Anthony did not qualify for protection. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 7:49 am
In Lady Donna Dutchess v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
As family courts struggle with huge caseloads and as a movement to informalize procedure gains ground, Family Law Prof Blog has this to say about Elkins v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The plaintiff, a California company, obtained a default judgment against the defendants in its home state and thereafter filed an action in the Superior Court in Connecticut seeking to enforce the California judgment or, alternatively, to recover under the theories of breach of contract or quantum meruit. [read post]
