Search for: "State v. Vice"
Results 761 - 780
of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Regular in-state purchases insufficient.Rawlins v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
The state of Minnesota joined in as a plaintiff as well. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:33 pm
Bernard and Hadary affirmatively state that the Terms of Use in operation during the December 2012 time frame included a forum-selection clause. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:13 pm
Vice Chancellor Travis Laster’s decision in the plaintiff’s favor was based on Boilermakers v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
In October 2013, he traveled to Bologna, Italy with his wife, Bertha Huff, and with Airport Board Vice Chairman Larry Savage to attend a business conference. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 8:56 am
” On September 20 I moderated a Cato discussion of recent developments and upcoming challenges to ICWA, presented by Timothy Sandefur, Vice President for Litigation at the Goldwater Institute and author of Escaping the ICWA Penalty Box; Matthew McGill, attorney for plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what would happen under a Monroe County (New York) bill, proposed by County Executive Maggie Brooks, County Legislature Vice President Michael G. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Coleman v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Moore received a text message from Dunn stating that Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 9:11 am
In Todd Swift v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:19 pm
New Oxford vice chancellor speaks out against threats to free inquiry as well as overregulation of universities [Iain Martin, CapX] Feds: get in line on Title IX or we’ll yank your institutional science funding [Inside Higher Ed, background on Title IX] More on scheme proposing mandatory oppression studies for first-year students at American University [Robby Soave/The Daily Beast (and thanks for mention), earlier] Back to the days of Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
For example, when the Court decided the 1934 case of Blaisdell v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
In the recent decision of CHC Investments LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Stoner v. [read post]
