Search for: "Stevens v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 7,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
United States, 575 U.S. 723 (2015). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am
Steven Sieff, consultant in the tax team at CMS, offers a preview of the decision awaited in Project Blue Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs After initially being heard by the First-tier Tribunal in 2013 and most recently by the Court of Appeal in 2016, the Project Blue SDLT case finally reached the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 28 February 2018. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Steven R. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
" Here is how it starts:Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
Personal injury lawyer Steven Gursten teaches what McCormick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 am
The case -- Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
In the 1982 case of Edgar v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 9:28 am
Today, we're filing this brief for the respondent in Virginia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
My FindLaw column, which will appear (here) later today, discusses the case of United States v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm
I was intrigued by a number of things: Stevens had served for decades on the federal bench almost completely out of the spotlight; despite knowing Kerner, Stevens had written a stinging dissent in a case (McNally v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:52 am
The indictment represents the first federal charges filed from the 2011 V-GRIP effort. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:52 am
The indictment represents the first federal charges filed from the 2011 V-GRIP effort. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:19 pm
In State of Washington v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
See also Daniels v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
(Justices Ginsberg and Stevens, neither of whom, I might add, remain either on the Court or breathing).Given that the Supreme Court has indisputably said that primaries have to be closed if that's what the party wants, the plaintiff's argument here that it's unconstitutional for a state to allow primaries to be closed is a surefire loser. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Justices Stevens and Ginnsburg dissented. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]
