Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 10:57 am
Legally speaking, they are required to have a "reasonable suspicion" of criminal activity in order to be in compliance with the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:03 am
Supervisors implied or explicitly stated that employees needed to arrive early to perform preliminary tasks. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm
From Weisenbach v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm
Fla. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that what constitutes “outrageous” conduct is a question of law. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:27 am
Background In 2015, The United States Environmental Protection Agency issued a notice of violation alleging that certain Volkswagen vehicles had been fitted with a device which could detect when that vehicle was being tested for emissions compliance and could manipulate the results. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:06 am
The United States District Court dismissed Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:49 am
A memo sent by a union to its bargaining unit members, which named two firefighters who had sued the union and the county for retaliation and stated that union members would likely have to pay more in dues to defend against these “frivolous” claims, was not speech on a matter of public concern, an Eleventh Circuit panel ruled in rejecting the union’s claim that the First Amendment immunized its speech. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
United States Sugar Corp. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
Failed to disclose this relationship to his supervisors; 3. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Interestingly, the case was tried before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:49 pm
The lawsuit, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, alleges that the county supervisors, in their capacity as drainage district trustees, are operating their drainage districts in an “unlawful and antisocial” manner that is contrary to the “public health and welfare. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
"In Donato's case, said the court, her allegations had satisfied the test as the comments made concerning her performance were "... so harsh as to be likely to persuade any other school board not to hire [her] as a supervisor. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:38 pm
Remember, there are other jurisdictions in the United States that view these issues differently. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
Prior to this Petitioner served in the United Stated Marine Corps for twenty years and retired as a Warrant Officer. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
United Staffing Alliance, another ERISA case involving a claimed right to medical benefits. ** 06-1505, Meacham v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Specht v. [read post]
