Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/hQDovsMelV -> The Sound of the Internet is Not So Sweet to the Ears of David Lowery http://t.co/ihFIPOFpxv -> Singapore Government to consult on role of website blocking in fighting online copyright infringement http://t.co/49noMfIMbQ -> "Focus on IP Law: A Conversation with Eric Schwartz." [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Massachusetts In the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, defendant Sandipan Chowdhury and his able lawyers from Booth Sweet LLP have been running rampant over a mostly absent Prenda. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 11:24 am
v=wsj15wPpjLY). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
Harms' imagination leaves little to the imagination:Candy/Fairy Floss or Cotton Candy"... one cannot escape the conclusion that as policy it promises candy-floss: it is very sweet but it becomes sticky if you touch it and it disintegrates on eating, leaving no aftertaste." [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:33 pm
FANTASY AND HARRISONGS V. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
A Poisonous Affair: America, Iraq, and the Gassing of Halabja by Joost R. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Mynar v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:14 pm
By Andrew DelaneyPreston v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:20 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 1st Amendment, Elane Photography, Elane Photography v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
One such deciduous publication which is also, paradoxically, an evergreen is Sweet & Maxwell's European Patent Decisions, the 44th release for which, current to July 2013, landed in this Kat's terrestrial mailbox late last week. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Special foods and beverages which are simply substitutes for your “normal” diet generally aren’t deductible (Harris v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Posted by Charles SartainThe prospect generator’s worst nightmare is presented in Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Anyway, the IPKat, Merpel and all the crew are at your disposal and look forward to sharing lots of news, views and fun with you in the four months that take us to the end of the year.After renaming the Patents County Court theIntellectual Property Enterprise Court, we nowhave a new name for the Court of AppealThis Kat is furious that the Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in Lumos Skincare Limited v Sweet Squared Limited and others -- a decision that drew some… [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
Les bon temps rouler, indeed.The case of Scianneaux v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Q. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:19 pm
In Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [read post]
