Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
We have stated this rule in slightly different ways. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
CAFA Does Not Play Any "Tricks;" It Merely Provides For Removal Anytime Jurisdiction Is Ascertained.
1 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:19 pm
Taylor, 50, Janesville, WI Charge: Warrant (m) FTA Arrested Evelyn D. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid furloughs.… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
Here, as in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit today vacated the order of Judge Taylor in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:48 pm
In CMH Set and Finish, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:14 am
The case is Orion Insurance Group v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
The CAFC panel had to distinguish Quantum Corp. v Rodine, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577 (Fed. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am
Taylor also moderated a discussion, which Howell shared on the Lawfare Podcast, about a Democratic congressional report on the Trump administration’s effect on the State Department. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Shane Taylor, [Maureen’s] witness, testified that he examined [her] computer. . . . [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.In contrast, in Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
The cases of R V Secretary of State for Social Security ex p Taylor and Chapman [1997] BPIR 505 where it was held that deductions can continue to be made between the making of a bankruptcy order and the bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy were said to be wrongly decided. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
The cases of R V Secretary of State for Social Security ex p Taylor and Chapman [1997] BPIR 505 where it was held that deductions can continue to be made between the making of a bankruptcy order and the bankrupt’s discharge from bankruptcy were said to be wrongly decided. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
