Search for: "Thomas v. Davis" Results 761 - 780 of 1,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 11:24 am by Elie Mystal
Nesson filed his papers today, and Judge Davis got back to him, today:Needless to say, Judge Davis declined to put Nesson’s brief into the record.But hey, nobody can accuse the courts for moving too slowly when it comes to smacking down law professors.Capitol Records v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:42 am by Ben Sheffner
In his original order, Judge Davis declined to reach the constitutional issues, citing United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
White people try to protect their privilege, black people try to level the playing field, Clarence Thomas tries to make sure that nobody else can benefit from the same social programs that helped him, and Asians and Jews say “WTF? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:41 am by Moseley Collins
Plaintiff Thomas Lee has pleaded this cause of action according to the requirements set forth in CACI 1621, and Thing v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H.… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
”  While Crawford and Davis were decided unanimously, Giles v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 2:46 pm by Jeralyn
Danny Davis (D-IL) introduced H.R. 1475, The Federal Prison Work Incentive Act. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Lyle Denniston
Examining the Supreme Court’s most significant ruling on a claim of innocence based on new, post-trial evidence — Herrera v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]