Search for: "U S A" Results 761 - 780 of 37,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2012, 5:26 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Here's a link to an article of mine entitled "U Need 2 Authentic8 TMs @ Trial" that appeared in the September/October 2012 edition of the The Pennsylvania Lawyer Magazine. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here's a round-up of reports and analysis of yesterday's opinion by the New York Court of Appeals in the "Columbia U. blight" case, Kaur v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Third, the Ohio U., SIU, and Merrill (U Missouri) matters all illustrate that the generalpopulace in 2008 is divided over what constitutes plagiarism. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The record established that there was a rational basis for the determination to uphold petitioner's U-rating, which was based on insubordination and unprofessional conduct during the relevant school year; and 3. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The record established that there was a rational basis for the determination to uphold petitioner's U-rating, which was based on insubordination and unprofessional conduct during the relevant school year; and 3. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The record established that there was a rational basis for the determination to uphold petitioner's U-rating, which was based on insubordination and unprofessional conduct during the relevant school year; and 3. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:26 am
It refused registration of U-HAUL TRAILER SHARING, U-HAUL TRAILERSHARING, U-HAUL TRAILER SHARE and U-HAUL TRAILERSHARE without a disclaimer of the word TRAILERSHARE and variations thereof. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm
However, Sutfin ended up making a U-Turn right into the path of Robinson’s vehicle. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:23 pm
So says UC Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky about the U. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:19 am by Varun Chhonkar
The opposition proceedings was fought on the grounds of lack of (1) inventiveness u/s 25(1)(e) and (2) enablement u/s 25(1)(g). [read post]