Search for: "U. S. v. Banning" Results 761 - 779 of 779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
They are truly perverts and it's not curable. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
The two most enlightening ones are his concurrence in US v Lopez and his dissent in Gonzales v Raich. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:29 am
Mike's posting earlier today quotes extensively from Posner's dissent from the en banc decision in Hope Clinic v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
It's one thing to take a different view in this case and depart from what the Court did a few years ago in Stenberg v Carhart (the state PBA ban case). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:49 am
After a preliminary read-through, the scariest sentence in the opinion to me is this one: The Act’s failure to allow the banned procedure’s use where ” ‘necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for preservation of the [mother’s] health,’ ” Ayotte v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
Brief for Respondents in No. 05.380, p. 19 (quoting 530 U. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
Just skimmed the Supreme Court's opinion upholding the federal ban on partial-birth abortion. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
   [Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]