Search for: "U.S Army Corps of Engineers"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
Army Corps of Engineers, et al, without comment letting stand the 6th Circuit decision HMC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 10:38 pm
The U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
EPA’s and Army Corps of Engineers’ proposed rule redefining Waters of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) for the 12,000 acre Newhall Ranch Specific Plan site. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:56 am
<> Corps Meeting On dredging in Cleveland Harbor and Cuyahoga River - Army Corps of Engineers Buffalo District will host a public information open house about proposed open lake placement of sediment dredged from the upper federal navigation channel of the Cuyahoga River. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
By William Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Katherine Hart, Glen Hansen, and Brian Russell Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2014 1st Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:51 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) and Rapanos v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:29 am
Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Army Corps of Engineers), the ability to avoid weekly penalties of up to $20,000 by simply requesting additional information may be too tantalizing to pass up. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
On March 25, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) jointly released a proposed rule purporting to clarify the scope of the “waters of the United States” protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
By Lesley Foxhall Pietras On March 25, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) jointly released a proposed rule purporting to clarify the scope of the “waters of the United States” protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:49 am
EPA and Army Corps of Engineers redefining their Clean Water Act jurisdiction was just a restatement of the current law. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:48 am
Environmental Protection Agency’s and Army Corps of Engineers’ proposed rule defining what waters fall under federal jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers proposed a rule that would clarify which bodies of water are subject to the Clean Water Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:02 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, and Rapanos v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers announced the release of their proposed rule defining what waters fall under federal jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
National / International News <> EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Clarify Protection for Nation's Streams and Wetlands - U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:05 pm
Additionally, EPA and the Army Corps have coordinated with the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:44 am
Here, in summary, are some of the issues in other cases that the Court refused to grant on Monday: ** The scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to veto a permit to discharge pollutants into a waterway, after the permit had been issued by the Army Corps of Engineers and the discharge had continued for several years (Mingo Logan Coal Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:45 am
<> Army Corps OKs money to address Great Lakes' 'hole in the dike' - The U.S. [read post]
