Search for: "U.S. v. Baker" Results 761 - 780 of 1,712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 6:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
  Prior to joining the faculty at Missouri, Dr Strong was Counsel specializing in international dispute resolution at Baker & McKenzie LLP and a dual-qualified practitioner (U.S. [read post]
10 May 2014, 12:23 am by Florian Mueller
At any rate, the Supreme Court was divided over that one.A long, long time ago there was Baker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new decision followed the pattern of the widest-ranging recent decisions against same-sex marriage restrictions: * It ruled that the Supreme Court had not already settled the same-sex marriage issue in a one-line summary decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:45 pm by Emily Dai
Stewart Baker shared an episode of The Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring interviews with Jordan Schneider to discuss recent Beijing tech policy, Michael Weiner to unpack FTC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
Baker Oil Tools, Inc., 143 F.2d 1003 (9th Cir. 1944)). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society blog, Ashley Baker remarks that Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The law firm sues an incorrect governmental entity, in this case the City of New York rather than the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
After law school, she served as a law clerk for Judge Constance Baker Motley, U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Wittes issued an editor’s note related to Baker’s post. [read post]