Search for: "US Justice Department"
Results 761 - 780
of 52,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2024, 11:30 pm
They’ll use it to develop an area semiconductor industry. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 11:30 pm
They’ll use it to develop an area semiconductor industry. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm
I see no need to depart from that familiar and time-tested procedure here. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
First, Justice Thomas wrote: Before the President or a Department Head can appoint any officer, however, the Constitution requires that the underlying office be "established by Law. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
The birds that used to be bees . . . [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
How California’s ‘Junk Fee’ Laws Could Impact Legislation NationwideHotel Dive – July 1, 2024 According to California’s Department of Justice, “the price a Californian sees should be the price they pay. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
Increased judicial scrutiny may also lead to a rise in challenges to noncompetition agreements, potentially limiting their use and effectiveness.8. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Thomas Uses Trump Immunity Ruling to Question Jack Smith Appointment MSN – Perry Stein (Washington Post) | Published: 7/1/2024 Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas tackled a question in his presidential immunity opinion that Donald Trump’s attorneys did not bring before the nation’s highest court: Was special counsel Jack Smith legally appointed? [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
” In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown-Jackson, argued that sleeping outside is some people’s only option, and using jails or fines is “cruel and unusual” punishment for being homeless. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:03 pm
On June 28, 2024, the US Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
This press release from Oregon's crazy, bloated health department reveals that the terminology you may be using is no longer appropriate. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 8:45 am
Supreme Court Justices will tell you that their rulings are for the ages and cannot always take into account the peculiarities of the parties before them.Second, official acts are immune from criminal prosecution and cannot be used in any trial against a former President, including as background evidence or evidence that would place his unlawful acts in context. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:02 pm
" There are countless potential civil litigants, but only one Department of Justice. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:35 pm
Others, beginning with the dissenting justices, have pointed out most of them already. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm
With their now enhanced “official acts” powers, the President could conceivably arrest members of Congress after ordering the Justice Department to investigate them for “election rigging. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm
Justice Department (DOJ) and the FCC submitted their brief on the matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:44 am
In concurrence, Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Thomas, further elaborated on this view of the Seventh Amendment question, while explaining why Article III and the Due Process Clause reinforced the Court’s decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:39 am
Seen in this light, the major questions doctrine is a tool for discerning—not departing from—the text’s most natural interpretation. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:06 am
The court grants absolute immunity against criminal prosecution for any of a president’s “core” executive acts, which the court went on to define as including any use of the Justice Department—an ostensibly and traditionally independent agency–for criminal investigation. [read post]
