Search for: "US v. London"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The amendment was a direct response to the 2005 US Supreme Court ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
It has a licensing department, and an annual litigation budget in the billions of dollars (an Optis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
Join us next Wednesday at 2PM (London time)The IPKat's joint panel event with the London School of Economics (LSE) on 21 April 2021 is less than a week away. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Lamelas notes that Intel Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm
A regular reader of the Legal Costs Blog recently got in touch to ask whether the decision in National Westminster Bank v Kotonou [2009] EWHC 3309 (Ch) was a useful one when challenging the costs associated with the funding of a claim. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
City of New London (2005), which ruled that almost anything — including privately owned "economic development" — can qualify as a "public use" under the Fifth Amendment, allowing the government to seize property through the use of eminent domain. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
Arnold J held that the certificate signed by the Chargé D’Affairs of the Embassy of Iraq in London, which stated that Iraq’s claims were not in use nor intended for use for any commercial purposes, must be accepted as sufficient evidence pursuant to s 13(5) of the Act, unless proved otherwise by the appellant. [read post]
11 May 2013, 12:45 pm
Then, of course, we broke the Act with Malcolm v Lewisham LBC [2008] UKHL 43; [2008] HLR 41). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
Kat friends Nina O'Sullivan and Victoria Wilson from Mishcon de Reya in London report on these developments. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
If you were away last week, or too busy working to check us out, this is what you missed (courtesy of Jeremy together with Alberto Bellan): Star Wars? [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:37 am
In the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, Tucows.Com Co v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Zainab Hodgson of CMS summarise the first day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC, which concerns a claim alleging that the appellant (‘Google’) breached its duties as a data controller to over 4m Apple iPhone users during a period of some months in 2011- 2012, when Google was able to collect and use their browser generated information. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
In Astellas v Teva/Sandoz, Anna Edwards-Stuart took to her feet during trial, as well as Sarah Love for Apple in IDG v Lenovo. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Well then Guest Kat Rosie's The protection of vehicles using trade marks and registered designs - London Taxis vs Scooters is the read for you! [read post]
14 May 2025, 10:29 am
Of the eight, the Court was unable to locate four: (1) London v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm
The campaign involved two street protests outside Mr Hourani’s London home, online publications via websites and social media, and the distribution of stickers in the vicinity of Mr Hourani’s home. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Annual meeting and diversity conference Time: 21st January 2020, 9.00 to 17.00 Place: Kilburn & Strode at Lacon London, 84 Theobalds Road, London WC1X 8NL. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
Against that, in Prospect Estates Ltd v Grosvener Estates Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1281 (discussed by us here) focused on actual and permitted use (lease only allowed c.11.5% of the property to be used for residential purposes). [read post]
