Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
On the other hand, countries are fighting to get their cultural property back to promote their own states’ national identities.[1] The disputed ownership of artifacts in western museums is a well-known global issue. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Massachusetts (1944) (noting that "[t]he right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community … to communicable disease"); United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
Indeed, the narrower a definition of imminence that we accept, the more this becomes a problem, since the time frame in which the government could simultaneously demonstrate that a target (1) poses such a threat to the United States; and (2) cannot be captured through less lethal measures [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The Washington Post, which went to court in the cases outlined below to obtain sealed records of these scripted activities, explained how these “sell, sell, sell” seminars operated virtually identically across the country.Cohen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm by bo5
  See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am by Steve McConnell
The syringes recalled were from a number of lots where there was a concern that unit package seal integrity may have been compromised for some of them. [read post]