Search for: "United States v. Arenas" Results 761 - 780 of 924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 2:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
: Since January 1, 2008 and through September 3, 2010, 283 banks have failed in the United States, and the total number of failed banks continues to grow. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
In the civil arena, a couple of notable First Amendment cases. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by Rich Cassidy
Larry Tribe is one of the leading constitutional law scholars in the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:36 am by Vivian Persand
Deposition of Michael Burton, a Large Loss Claims Property Unit Manager for Safeco in 2006; in the matter of Price v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm by Mairead Enright
This month the Guardian ran two opinion pieces on the presence of ‘sharia’ in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  He has also published articles on presidential approval ratings during foreign policy crises, Army efforts toward gender integration, and the experiences of Hispanics in the United States Army. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
On 8 June 2010 in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co v United States the Federal Appeals Court for the District of Columbia upheld the dismissal of a defamation suit for statements that Clinton administration officials reportedly made to the press to justify the missile attack against a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan in 1998. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, which begins: The owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant sued the United States for unjustifiably destroying the plant, failing to compensate them for its destruction, and defaming them by asserting they had ties to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
They report: “Every relator we interviewed stated that the financial bounty offered under the federal statute had not motivated their participation in the qui tam lawsuit. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
§4248 in United States v, Comstock on the basis that the Constitution does not grant the Federal government authority to institutionalize them beyond their maximum prison commitment. [read post]