Search for: "United States v. Chang" Results 761 - 780 of 19,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 8:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a claim that people working for United States Steel are entitled to compensation for the time spent dressing for work. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
The Durban Conference of the Parties (COP17) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is finally over two days after talks were scheduled to conclude. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Tom Webley
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:44 am
I previously noted that the result in Briggs and Clay would have been different had they been tried today, due to the R.C.M. 912(f)(4) change designed to compel a different result in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am by MBettman
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether the Majority Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit conflicts with the decisions of this Supreme Court and other Circuit Courts of Appeals, thereby changing the well-established rules of contract construction which require specific contract provisions govern over general provisions to resolve disputes caused by two conflicting contract provisions? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:03 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
About 2-1/2 months after hearing oral arguments, the Supreme Court of the United States today rendered its decision in the case of Hamilton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
In so holding, the Fifth Circuit relied heavily on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:27 pm by Jim Chen
This presentation will focus on three faces of climate change law in the United States:Federal regulation after Massachusetts v. [read post]