Search for: "United States v. Davies"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:27 pm
Arizona (1969) and Davis v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Davis, 885 F.2d at 522. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
We can also consider more contemporary lower court decisions adjudicating challenges to laws discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.One important theme running through this precedent employs a recurring set of criteria (tracing back to the famous Footnote 4 of the United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am
Among those, just eight cite the most relevant texts: the Fourteenth Amendment (the basis for the finding that partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable under the Constitution in Davis v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:57 am
The legal compact demanded by the United States Supreme Court when it reinstituted capital punishment as a sentencing option in 1976 has been broken, repeatedly, not by convicts, but by hundreds of overzealous administrators of the nation's justice systems. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
Second, the logic of Davis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
Currently featuring North America (Canada, the United States, and Mexico), the work continues! [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am
The first is Ayestas v. [read post]
