Search for: "United States v. Earth" Results 761 - 780 of 909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
"Now, imagine you are the CEO or General Counsel of a telcom company that has been assisting the NSA in electronic surveillance for two years, assured that what appear to be your violations of FISA do not subject you to legal exposure because you have been relying on the certification "by the Attorney General of the United States that no warrant or court order is required by law. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
  That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
And it is now my great privilege to introduce the 46th President of the United States, Joe Biden. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 2:40 pm by Stuart Kaplow
The 45th President of the United States is not a 1960s Barry Goldwater environmentalist who favored “federal intervention with regards to the environment. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
 In particular, the bill states: (b) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:30 am by Jon Katz
Carrico blundered in penning the Virginia Supreme Court opinion declining to overturn the law criminalizing interracial marriage, only to have the United States Supreme Court unanimously reverse him. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm by Frank Pasquale
” Balkin says the two positions are ultimately symbiotic, since “dissensus about constitutional values—–the most characteristic feature of constituional Protestantism—is the great engine of constitutional change, shaping even that most ‘catholic’ of institutions, the United States Supreme Court” (97). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:05 am by SHG
It’s not that it doesn’t matter who is elected president of the United States, and whether you vote for bad or worse, but that there are others who will impose their vision of morality upon us for whom we get no vote. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking is the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
First, given that the Bon Bon Song had only recently been released in the United States, and not in Australia at the time of the publication of the Mixed Bon Bon Song on the Suave Website, there will have been a class of listeners who, upon listening the Mixed Bon Bon Version for the first time through the Suave Website, would have presumed that the altered section formed part of the authentic, original Bon Bon Song. [read post]