Search for: "United States v. Florida"
Results 761 - 780
of 6,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2019, 2:21 am
In Wesley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Case date: 27 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-14374 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Unfortunately, slip and fall accidents happen routinely in Florida and throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
” In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Koontz (SC09-713), the Florida Supreme Court applied the United States Supreme Court's case law interpreting the takings clause of the United States Constitution and held: Accordingly, we hold that under the takings clauses of the United States and Florida Constitutions, the Nollan/Dolan rule with regard to “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” is applicable only where the… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
That’s the law here in the State of Florida. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
It is therefore crucial that they review the recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Downs v. [read post]
7 May 2006, 9:37 am
In a recent case, two homeowners immigrated from Switzerland and resided legally in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
In both Alden and the 1996 case, Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:48 am
(“NAVL”) of Fort Wayne, Indiana filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, North America Moving & Storage, Inc. of Miami Beach, Florida infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration No. 917,431 for the mark “NORTHAMERICAN”. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Florida (1996). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm
(“CTI”), provided cyber-security training both as a prime contractor and subcontractor with the United States government. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
