Search for: "United States v. Gross" Results 761 - 780 of 1,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Although the rule insulates the decision makers from ordinary negligence,[7] it can typically be overcome by a showing of gross negligence.[8] States may differ in whether the rule applies to both directors and officers (e.g., Delaware[9]), only to directors (e.g., Florida[10]), or only to “outside” directors (e.g., California[11]). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:16 pm by Heidi A. Nadel
"Noting the the parties' agreement was governed by the MAA, the Supreme Judicial Court, following United States Supreme Court precedent in Hall St. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:16 pm by Heidi A. Nadel
"Noting the the parties' agreement was governed by the MAA, the Supreme Judicial Court, following United States Supreme Court precedent inHall St. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:16 pm by Heidi A. Nadel
"Noting the the parties' agreement was governed by the MAA, the Supreme Judicial Court, following United States Supreme Court precedent in Hall St. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:20 pm by D. Daxton White
MLPs it’s a new way of investing in, generally in energy, natural resources, sometimes real state. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The taxpayer worked for the United States Postal Service (USPS) as a letter carrier. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:40 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Based on this and other evidence of pretext, summary judgment for the hospital was reversed (Wheeler v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:46 pm by Gerson & Schwartz, P.A.
Historically, punitive damages in federal maritime cases were not always viable until the United States Supreme Court decided Atlantic Sounding Co, Inc, v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
However, this subsection shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Florida. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Randy Barnett
 But is this theory applicable to the President of the United States? [read post]