Search for: "United States v. Legal Services for New York City"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The New War on ContraceptionThere was a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
In a typical week she fills orders primarily to New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, Colorado, and California, with gross annual sales of $273,000. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
In a typical week she fills orders primarily to New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, Colorado, and California, with gross annual sales of $273,000. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
The Baltimore City Circuit Court has vacated the initial Patel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
United States In an interesting derogation from US copyright laws the Library of Congress granted an exception to the DMCA’s principles preventing the circumvention of technological measures in the archiving of software. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
New York.[23] Central Hudson held that restrictions on commercial speech are subject to intermediate scrutiny.[24] Under the four part analysis, the court must first ask whether the commercial speech at issue is false, misleading, or illegal.[25] If it is, then the government may restrict it and no further inquiry is necessary. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
United States On 24 August Reuters had an article “Sarah Palin can sue New York Times for defamation – court ruling”. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
There has been an interesting discussion in the States regarding truthtelling and newspapers, after the New York Times’ public editor, Arthur Brisbane, penned a column asking for “reader input on whether and when New York Times news reporters should challenge ‘facts’ that are asserted by newsmakers they write about”. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer… [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
In the United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Vance, which concerns the validity of subpoenas issued to Mazars by New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., pursuant to a criminal state grand-jury investigation. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
