Search for: "United States v. Long" Results 761 - 780 of 23,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am by Santiago Stocker
-based Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU) indicate these elections were highly questionable. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
Ghana, a member state of the United Nations, stood alongside 119 other nations on October 27, 2023, in favor of a humanitarian truce in Gaza. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
At the same time, critics of the administrative state have called into question authority of administrative agencies to adjudicate claims in light of Article III’s command that “[t]he judicial power of the United States shall be vested” in courts. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
And as I pointed out here, disembodied designs are already automatically (and costlessly) protected by copyright as long as they can meet the low standard of creativity mandated by Feist v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am by centerforartlaw
I needed to prepare to work on the first case of a foreign country suing in the United States to recover cultural property. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am by jonathanturley
There are so many criminal laws that do criminalize speech, and so the notion that the president of the United States somehow has a First Amendment right to be protected by the government for his speech doesn’t make any sense. [read post]