Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 761 - 780 of 1,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm by Peter Margulies
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
 committed by an enemy belligerent against the United States in the context of an armed conflict. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
The United States’s Doreen Bogdan-Martin will face Russia’s Rashid Ismailov in a vote that occurred Sept. 29. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm by Steve Vladeck
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
United States of America, which vacated a U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Rogers M. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:24 am
Trent was convicted of a sex crime in Indiana in May of 2007.Trent asked the court to dismiss the indictment, claiming that the law violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
  With respect to these seventeen petitioners, the Executive Branch has determined not to allow them to enter the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:05 pm by Gregory Forman
 That Action Transmittal discusses the procedural components required for enforcing child support obligations in compliance with the United States Supreme Court decision in Turner v. [read post]