Search for: "United States v. Younge" Results 761 - 780 of 3,944
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am by rainey Reitman
His latest book is POESY THE MONSTER SLAYER, a picture book for young readers. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm by Amy Howe
Shapiro countered that it is not enough to consider that the defendant is young. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
He also gutted funding for the United Nations Population Fund, which provides family planning services globally.He then crafted a “domestic gag rule” that imposed the same restrictions on organizations in the United States, something not done by previous Republican presidents. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Association of Foreign Press Correspondents in the United States (AFC-USA) also said in its response to the Department of Homeland Security’s proposals that they could put journalists from countries with poor human rights records in danger by forcing them to return home “where they risk retaliation because they’ve done critical, truthful reporting while in the States”. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Katharine Young
By 1977, a total of thirty-five states had ratified the ERA, falling short of the three-fourths of the states prescribed by Article V. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
” If passed by the Senate and signed into law, the Act would clarify employer obligations set forth in the 2015 United States Supreme Court decision in Young v. [read post]