Search for: "WADE v. STATE" Results 761 - 780 of 3,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
 Faster, easier and clearer for the Legislature to solve this problem than it is for the California Supreme Court to wade in. [read post]
13 May 2009, 2:21 am
Christensen, MDCitation: 2009 WY 64Docket Number: S-07-0295Appeal from the District Court of Park County, the Honorable Wade E. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:47 pm by Meg Martin
CABCitation: 2010 WY 9Docket Number: S-09-0097Appeal from the District Court of Carbon County, the Honorable Wade E. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Wade, driven by more people ending pregnancies in states that have laws friendly to abortion care. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
Wade, saying that in both cases, the SCOTUS violated the federalist principle of deference to the judgment of state legislatures. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
An issue is moot when it may not properly be decided by this court unless it is found to be within the exception to the doctrine which permits the courts to preserve for review important and recurring issues which, by virtue of their relatively brief existence, would be rendered otherwise nonreviewable as held in Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne and Roe v Wade. [read post]