Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 10,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm
If we consider the ruling of Longmore LJ in the Court of Appeal decision in UK Housing Alliance v Francis (which we discussed here) he states that the Act contains a "pervading reference to money 'paid' by the tenant to the landlord, 'received' by the landlord and 'repayable' by the landlord to the tenant". [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm
’” Bloome v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm
I can’t wait to read Joel Gora’s new article in the Georgia State Law Review symposium on Citizens United. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
Last month in Cumbie v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
In Heimeshoff v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
In this week’s case (Telus Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 1:11 pm
State and Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:25 pm
In Scott v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
The court then distinguished Harrelson v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:30 pm
No, wait. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:37 am
Bouaphakeo might be the game-changing decision they have been waiting for. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
Proposition 65, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in AFL-CIO v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
”’” (Id. at p. 382, quoting Graham, supra, 560 U.S. at p. 69 and Kennedy v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 6:56 am
Yesterday's Court of Appeals decision In Ralph Barnett v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 12:11 pm
After thorough arguments from both sides of the debate, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:50 am
The ruling California SLAPPaholics have been waiting for has issued this morning: Yes, that would be the order on the en banc petition in Makaeff v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Mayo states its argument quite simply in the opening sentence of its brief, relying on the Court’s 2012 precedent in Mayo v. [read post]