Search for: "Walls v. Walls" Results 761 - 780 of 11,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Wilkes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:56 am
Davis for having presented the case for school segregation to the Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:15 am
The difference between a mandatory list and a non-mandatory listWall v Town of Niskayuna, USDC, N.D.N.Y. 1-29-2009, 07-CV-350, decided May 22, 2009One of the central issues in the Wall case* concerning the 2005 promotion of a police officer from Sergeant to Lieutenant was the allegation that the promotion was made from a civil service list that was invalid because it contained the names of only two candidates while three were needed to constitute a valid list.Making a permanent… [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm by Peter Groves
Innermost Ltd v Warm BL O/464/19 is that rare thing, a case about licensing of right under Part III of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm by Peter Groves
Innermost Ltd v Warm BL O/464/19 is that rare thing, a case about licensing of right under Part III of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:21 am by Howard Friedman
The Wall Street Journal has a preview of the decisions.UPDATE: In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm by McLarty Wolf Litigation Lawyers
The post Case Comment: Holman v Brooke, 2022 BCSC 526 appeared first on McLarty Wolf. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
At their private Conference tomorrow, the Justices will consider the petition in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:12 pm
US, Kimbrough v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:21 pm by Harold O'Grady
A Wall Street Journal article reports that the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:42 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Getty Images via @daylifeNew York County Criminal Court Judge Matthew Sciarrino  recently declined the defendant's motion to quash a subpoena in People v. [read post]