Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
” Barnes discusses the pending petition in Williams v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Wagner, Wendy, Katherine Barnes and Lisa Peters. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Diane Barnes, Youngstown State University Law, Religion, and Manumissions: Delaware and Slavery, Darlene Spitzer-Antezana, Prince George’s Community College Slave Manumissions and Property Rights in Antebellum Kentucky, Andrea S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
Barnes notes that although Justice O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Holzum v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
Lyle Denniston of this blog reported on the motion yesterday; Robert Barnes of the Washington Post also has coverage of the motion, as does Ars Technica, which notes that three other states – Louisiana, Michigan, and Illinois – have all reimbursed the Entertainment Software Association for legal fees after their own failed attempts to regulate video games. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:45 am
In today’s Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at how the Court’s ruling in the violent video games case presents Justice Scalia’s and Justice Thomas’s sharply divergent views on what speech rights minors can claim under the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
Finally, coverage of Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at voting patterns on the Court and concludes that although this Term “lacked the blockbuster decisions of years past, [] it appeared to make one thing clear: George W. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
The Daily Kos, Adam Liptak at the New York Times, Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, and Forbes all have additional coverage. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm
For instance last week, Alito authored the majority opinion in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports on the “very different views of the criminal justice system” taken by Justices Alito and Sotomayor, the Court’s two former prosecutors and “two of the court’s most outspoken members on criminal justice issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
Additional coverage can be found from Mark Walsh of the Education Week Blog, Joan Biskupic at USA Today, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, the Christian Science Monitor, the Charlotte Observer, and the Durham Herald Sun. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
Additional coverage of the case comes from Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times (via the San Francisco Chronicle), CNN, and Courthouse News Service. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:35 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the creation of the Plessy& Ferguson Foundation, a civil rights education organization founded by two descendants of the parties to the case in which the Court upheld the system of “separate but equal” segregation. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Bob Barnes, in the Washington Post, and Joan Biskupic, in the USA Today, echo that reading of the case. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the sequels to Citizens United, which are raising “[i]ssues such as how the government may regulate disclosure of spending, and whether bans on direct corporate contributions to candidates” are permissible. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
” Elsewhere in the Post, Barnes also has coverage of the government’s recent cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
