Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court"
Results 761 - 780
of 902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Superior Court overwhelmingly reduced business’ ability to classify workers as independent contractors. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:37 am
That would be an interesting argument indeed, but I question whether it will carry much water in a court, before a judge or jurors, who in my experience are unsympathetic even to minor tax frauds, to say nothing of allegedly insane douchenozzles and alien lizard people. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
Canada On 2 July 2024, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued its ruling involving the encampment at the University of Toronto, granting the University its requested order that can be used to remove the encampment, University of Toronto (Governing Council) v Doe et al. 2024 ONSC 3755. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Rambling RooftopsWatson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am
Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 8:37 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Clean Train Coalition Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 12:00 pm
Southern California Edison, 19STCV03419, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Manriquez petitioned the superior court for a writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
Superior Court (United Conservation Water Dist.), case no. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Kardesch, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
