Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
I’ve recently published some articles that suggest that the Court ought to be more transparent in its non-merits orders work (here and here). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
Apropos Eugene’s post quoting John Adams, and also relevant to the question of eliminating potential arguments from one’s brief, I thought I’d share a quote from Pliny the Younger sent in by reader Martin White: I have frequent debates with a certain acquaintance of mine, a man of skill and learning, who admires nothing so much in the eloquence of the bar as conciseness. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:02 am
As regular readers of this blog have been reminded all too often, I wrote an article about the Necessary and Proper Clause arguing that we should pay more attention to the “great powers” that were thought to be excluded from the scope of the clause. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 11:31 am
" Will Baude has this post today at "The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
If you read Howard Bashman’s appellate blog, How Appealing (and honestly if you are a lawyer and read this blog you probably do) then you may have noticed that there is a proposal to change the default length of appellate briefs in federal court (from 14,000 words to 12,500 words). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
One of my favorite rules of criminal procedure (what? [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
[Will Baude, Ilya Somin, Michael McConnell] A previous high court ruling had kicked the case back to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings [earlier here and here.] [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
I’ve been excited to start reading several new academic books, and I decided I couldn’t wait to blog about them until I have finished them. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Asay cdasay BYU Richard Ashcroft qmulbioethics Queen Mary London Jonathan Askin jaskin Brooklyn Lisa Austin Lisa_M_Austin Toronto Regina Austin raustin92913 Penn Ian Ayres iayres Yale Barbara Babcock bababcock Stanford Sandra Babcock sandralbabcock Cornell Sam Bagenstos sbagen Michigan Stephen Bainbridge ProfBainbridge UCLA Jeffrey Baker JRBProf Faulkner Jack Balkin jackbalkin Yale David Ball wdavidball Santa Clara Derek Bambauer dbambauer Arizona Jennifer Bankier jbankier Dalhousie John Banzhaf… [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:49 am
In an op-ed for The New York Times, William Baude urges the Court to provide more information regarding the orders that it issues, arguing that, with “[t]he court . . . in the spotlight more and more, “[t]ransparency in all its decisions is vital to its continued legitimacy. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 2:15 pm
Check out William Baude's (U. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 9:45 am
"The Supreme Court's Secret Decisions": Law professor William Baude has this op-ed in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:55 am
I have an op-ed in today’s New York Times discussing the Supreme Court’s orders. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
[Will Baude] Most Justices have had little practical exposure to criminal law which can leave it a blind spot for them [Radley Balko] Tweet Tags: constitutional law, EEOC, religious liberty, Supreme CourtSupreme Court and constitutional law roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
During his talk at our law school’s graduation last June, my colleague Eric Posner distinguished between “hard” questions and “super-hard” questions. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:20 am
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Armstrong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:20 am
Rick Hasen has a very short new essay attempting to measure who is “The Most Sarcastic Justice. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
As William Baude explains in his preview for this blog, the Court will consider “whether the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution gives plaintiffs a cause of action to enjoin state action as preempted, even when the preempting statute does not. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 am
Over at SCOTUSblog, Will Baude has posted a helpful (and helpfully concise) preview of the oral argument that will take place before the Supreme Court later this morning in Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
” Will Baude has a good post explaining the case in greater detail here. [read post]
